


Since 1 July 2026, several merchants and PSPs working with a crypto payment provider are asking themselves the same question: is my current partner still in good standing. This isn't an abstract worry. A number of players that operated under older national registration regimes didn't all secure CASP authorization in time under MiCA. Switching providers is no longer a matter of convenience, it sometimes becomes an operational necessity.
A crypto payment partner that stays vague about its exact regulatory status, or whose status remains "pending" months after MiCA's full rollout, is sending a signal worth not ignoring. It's not necessarily a sign of a serious problem, but it's a point worth digging into before continuing to route payment flows through them.
Before deciding to stay or switch providers, four points worth checking systematically:
Switching crypto payment providers doesn't mean rebuilding your entire infrastructure. For a PSP or an e-commerce merchant, technical migration usually runs through a new API connection, without touching the rest of the existing payment flow. For a physical retailer, the main concern is service continuity at checkout during the transition, not a hardware replacement.
A partner licensed as a payment agent under ACPR sits within a recognized, verifiable French supervisory framework, with the oversight obligations that come with it. It isn't the only thing to check, but it's a concrete starting point for assessing a partner's regulatory solidity, before even looking at features or pricing.
Systematically ask for written proof of current regulatory status, not a verbal statement. A transparent payment partner has no reason not to provide it quickly.


